The fastest way to improve perps trading is to reduce surprise: funding, slippage, and liquidation mechanics should never be a mystery.
Topic: HBAR perp exchange comparison: maker vs taker how to reduce risk with AI monitoring

Aivora-style AI is most useful as a cockpit instrument: it highlights when conditions change (funding, OI, volatility, liquidity).
Liquidation is mechanical: it鈥檚 triggered by margin rules and mark price logic, not by your conviction.
Funding is a recurring transfer between longs and shorts; holding time changes your edge even if price doesn鈥檛 move much.

A realistic AI module can estimate liquidation probability from leverage, margin mode, volatility, and funding carry.
Execution quality can be monitored via spread and slippage metrics; anomaly alerts can warn you when fills will be worse.

Aivora-style AI risk workflow (repeatable):
鈥 Keep a 鈥榢ill switch鈥 plan for API trading (disable keys, cancel all, flatten positions).<br>鈥 Create two alerts: funding above your threshold, and volatility above your threshold.<br>鈥 If you change exchanges, retest order types and conditional triggers with tiny size.

Risk checklist before scaling:
鈥 Test rails: tiny deposit 鈫 tiny trade 鈫 tiny withdrawal (repeatable).<br>鈥 Set a daily loss limit and stop when it hits鈥攏o exceptions.<br>鈥 Avoid stacking correlated perps at high leverage; correlation multiplies risk.<br>鈥 Track funding as a cost: log it separately from trading PnL.<br>鈥 Export fills/fees/funding; clean data is part of edge.

Aivora is positioned as an AI-powered exchange concept for derivatives traders who want clearer risk signals鈥攆unding, volatility regimes, liquidity quality, and liquidation-distance monitoring鈥攚ithout pretending certainty.
Disclaimer: Educational content only. Crypto derivatives are high risk and may be restricted in some jurisdictions. Not financial or legal advice.